
Friday, August 3, 2007
Boho Mary-Kate
Mary-Kate Olsen a avut inspiratia sa combine un tricou alb, cu decolteu V-line, cu o fusta lunga cu accente crosetate, Azzedine Alaia. Rezultatul este grozav. Accesoriile si coafura ii dau un aer boem. Oja corai este si ea foarte bine aleasa. Pantofii sunt Balenciaga, iar geanta YSL.
Sex And The City ruined Sarah Jessica Parker’s body
In numarul din septembrie al revistei "Elle", UK, Sarah Jessica Parker dezvaluie ce impact negativ a avut asupra ei "Sex and the city". Ea declara ca si-a distrus picioarele din cauza ca filma 18-20 de ore pe tocuri. Pretul succesului.Si inca ceva: nu-i place cocteilul "Cosmopolitan", preferatul personajului Carrie interpretat de ea.
Thursday, August 2, 2007
Nicole going to same prison as Paris

Nicole Richie will serve her four-day jail sentence at a spot familiar to Paris Hilton - the Century Regional Detention Facility in Lynwood, CA. "[Richie's] attorney contacted us and indicated she wants to do her time there," a spokesperson for the LA County Sheriff's Department said today. The rep said no date was given for Richie's surrender, and it was not yet known whether the pregnant star would be housed in the jail's medical ward. "That's all determined by our medical staff upon her arrival," he added.
United nations
New Brangelina breakup rumors - Dlisted
Maggie Gyllenhaal on why she hates paparazzi - ICYDK
Popbytes snapped some red carpet pics at the Weeds premiere
Frugal-Fashionista does Sienna Miller
Keira is gloomy in green - Just Jared
A pregnant Nicole leaves the driving to someone else - TMZ
Us Weekly has a pint-sized fashion faceoff
Jessica Alba out and about - Popsugar
Britney avoids a face-to-face with Posh - I'm Not Obsessed
Fugs Footwear
Yay! I'm back! Let's get right back to Bingeness!
The jazz shoe trend is basically awful. I don't know if it's worse for men or women -- probably women since we have such a wider array of footwear choices -- is there really any excuse for CHOOSING to wear these? I mean, perhaps if I got in my time machine and sucked myself back to 1986, Rita Wilhelm's school of dance in suburban Cleveland, where I was mastering pivots and jazz hands and shit to the electro wop wops of Midnight Star (true story), perhaps THEN there would be a valid excuse. But it's not 1986 anymore (unfortunately), and therefore there is NO excuse.
Our prescient pals to the east, Shoewawa, over in UKtown, called y'all out on your shit back in January, pulling over these little printed horrors for a footwear felony in the first degree!
Objection sustained! These are a CRIME!
Then... Refinery29.com called out these metallic mortses in April.
A thousand nos! These Chausser shoes are an abomination. It's a sad fact, however, that these are fantasy fuck-me shoes, meaning that if a famous guy approached you wearing these, you'd totally fuck him despite the fact that he was wearing these. If any non-famous real-life guy attempted to even LOOK at you while wearing these, you'd do well to toss your drink in his face then slap him for good measure. All because of these faux pas. (Sorry, but you know it's true.)
Then Portland's Ultra commented on how Dior and Cause-Me-Pain-Hedi Slimane had been sending white jazzies down the catwalk in '06 eventhough Gucci male models did the runway
in them just the other month for their Spring/ Summer '08 show in Milan -- Oh the HORROR!
Um, hi. They sucked in 2006. They suck this year, and they will continue to suck in 2008.
In case you don't believe me, guys, you can get yourself a pair on Asos.com for just $55 and experience the fear first hand.

Or, ladies, you can feel the fear yourself:
($28, Urban Outfitters)
And you can defile four different colors, should you so choose, because they also come in white, teal, black and super no-no silver!
Also, these different variations of peep-toe boots and gladiator sandals need to end. Now. Let's start with these:
($429, Cesare Paciotti, Zappos)
Not so good, Al.
And now, a random parade of awful shoes.
($116, Kate Spade, Zappos)
No.
($116, Sigerson Morrison, Zappos)
I LOVE orange, and I LOVE tacky stuff, and even I was able to resist.
($186, Delman, Zappos)
Some poor helpless lamb died for Delman's sins. Unspeakable.
($694, Bruno Magli, Shoes.com)
Besides the movie "Bringing Down the House," I'm not sure what Queen Latifah did to deserve having these shit-striped twin towers named after her.
($83, BCBGirls, Zappos)
Isn't it bad enough that shitty shoes like these dominated the 1990s? Do they really need to make a return?
Okay... Now it's time for some redemption. Shoes I like! Onward!
($162, Betsey Johnson, Zappos)
I'm not crazy about the rose detail, but the colors rule.
($59, Pink Studio, Village-Shoes.com)
Ab fab print!
($79, Steve Madden, Nordstrom)
I was on the fence about these when I saw them on Lulu's Fashion Lounge. But they passed my "yes" test by a hair when I saw this close-up shot. The flowers are adorable and very shabby chic.
($32, Adi Designs, Overstock)
These are a wee bit Jessica Simpson-y, but I really like the heel height, the bow detail and the price! Huzzah!
($64, BCBGirls, Amazon)
These are also fairly silly, but they look comfy, and you never know when you'll receive a last-minute invite to a polo match.
Finally, and in news unrelated to footwear, my birthday is fast approaching, and I would really really appreciate this:
($869, Mike & Chris, ActiveEndeavors.com)
Thanking you in advance,
Tamron Lohan
The jazz shoe trend is basically awful. I don't know if it's worse for men or women -- probably women since we have such a wider array of footwear choices -- is there really any excuse for CHOOSING to wear these? I mean, perhaps if I got in my time machine and sucked myself back to 1986, Rita Wilhelm's school of dance in suburban Cleveland, where I was mastering pivots and jazz hands and shit to the electro wop wops of Midnight Star (true story), perhaps THEN there would be a valid excuse. But it's not 1986 anymore (unfortunately), and therefore there is NO excuse.
Our prescient pals to the east, Shoewawa, over in UKtown, called y'all out on your shit back in January, pulling over these little printed horrors for a footwear felony in the first degree!
Objection sustained! These are a CRIME!Then... Refinery29.com called out these metallic mortses in April.
A thousand nos! These Chausser shoes are an abomination. It's a sad fact, however, that these are fantasy fuck-me shoes, meaning that if a famous guy approached you wearing these, you'd totally fuck him despite the fact that he was wearing these. If any non-famous real-life guy attempted to even LOOK at you while wearing these, you'd do well to toss your drink in his face then slap him for good measure. All because of these faux pas. (Sorry, but you know it's true.)Then Portland's Ultra commented on how Dior and Cause-Me-Pain-Hedi Slimane had been sending white jazzies down the catwalk in '06 eventhough Gucci male models did the runway
in them just the other month for their Spring/ Summer '08 show in Milan -- Oh the HORROR!
Um, hi. They sucked in 2006. They suck this year, and they will continue to suck in 2008.In case you don't believe me, guys, you can get yourself a pair on Asos.com for just $55 and experience the fear first hand.

Or, ladies, you can feel the fear yourself:
($28, Urban Outfitters)And you can defile four different colors, should you so choose, because they also come in white, teal, black and super no-no silver!
Also, these different variations of peep-toe boots and gladiator sandals need to end. Now. Let's start with these:
($429, Cesare Paciotti, Zappos)Not so good, Al.
And now, a random parade of awful shoes.
($116, Kate Spade, Zappos)No.
($116, Sigerson Morrison, Zappos)I LOVE orange, and I LOVE tacky stuff, and even I was able to resist.
($186, Delman, Zappos)Some poor helpless lamb died for Delman's sins. Unspeakable.
($694, Bruno Magli, Shoes.com)Besides the movie "Bringing Down the House," I'm not sure what Queen Latifah did to deserve having these shit-striped twin towers named after her.
($83, BCBGirls, Zappos)Isn't it bad enough that shitty shoes like these dominated the 1990s? Do they really need to make a return?
Okay... Now it's time for some redemption. Shoes I like! Onward!
($162, Betsey Johnson, Zappos)I'm not crazy about the rose detail, but the colors rule.
($59, Pink Studio, Village-Shoes.com)Ab fab print!
($79, Steve Madden, Nordstrom)I was on the fence about these when I saw them on Lulu's Fashion Lounge. But they passed my "yes" test by a hair when I saw this close-up shot. The flowers are adorable and very shabby chic.
($32, Adi Designs, Overstock)These are a wee bit Jessica Simpson-y, but I really like the heel height, the bow detail and the price! Huzzah!
($64, BCBGirls, Amazon)These are also fairly silly, but they look comfy, and you never know when you'll receive a last-minute invite to a polo match.
Finally, and in news unrelated to footwear, my birthday is fast approaching, and I would really really appreciate this:
($869, Mike & Chris, ActiveEndeavors.com)Thanking you in advance,
Tamron Lohan
SS07 Beauty Trend: Clip The Front Back
Ever since watching the Olsen twins' last movie, New York Minute ages ago, I have started wearing my hair like the way Ashley did in this screenshot occasionally in the summer. (It feels much more like a summer-y hairstyle rather than winter-y doesn't it?) I've always thought of it as an easy, potentially sleek or cute hairstyle. Interestingly, it was the choice of hairstyle on the Versace SS07 runway.
If you have wavy hair or hair that is curled at the ends, then you can make this hairstyle look glamorous.
If you have straight hair (like I do,) then you can make this hairstyle look uber-sleek on you. One thing that I love about this hairstyle is that it seriously accentuates your features, especially your eyes. So if you're wearing this hairstyle for a night out, pile on the mascara and eyeliner, or make sure to highlight your cheekbones! But I can think of a few types of people who probably shouldn't wear this hairstyle. If you a) have a long face or forehead; b) have lots of pimples on your forehead; c) are over a certain age, then this hairstyle would probably just accentuate those features.
This hairstyle is great for everyday life because it's so easy to do. All you have to do is brush back the front part of your hair and use two pins to pin them in place at the crown of your head. I know this hairstyle is portrayed as a glamorous and sexy hairstyle at Versace show, but I think it's actually nice and practical if you're going to work and just want your hair out of your face. Another reason I like it is that it prevents the hair at the front from getting oily from contact with my face, which inevitably gets oily as the day goes on (-isn't that so annoying?) Plus, it's just a fun alternative to leaving my hair down everyday. Have you been wearing your hair like that too?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)